The "problem" of pacemakers or rabbits

Two or three months back in Runners World there was an interesting article on recreational marathon pacemakers. I don't believe these cats are quite "elites" but they are hired by several marathons to lead pace groups. Groups that want to break 4 hours in a marathon, or go under 3:45. This sort of thing.

The article was excellent. The author spoke of a time when he was leading a pace group but fell short of his goal and his guilt dealing with that. At the time of writing this article he was leading a group through the Philadelphia Marathon, and he had one cohort with him to lead the group. This time he and his partner made the finish and nearly everyone in his group made it as well in there time. A job well done.

I'll be honest, part of me looks down on these sort of groups as a way to reach a goal. But,in Philadelphia when I was doing my last half, around 8 miles when I realized I went out far too fast my mind drifted back to this article. I thought how it would have been nice to have been part of a pace group to insure that I didn't go out to fast, and that perhaps a sub 1:40 would have been much easier.

Granted, I never ran track in high school or college. I sure as hell haven't run professionally. It's a sport I picked up for myself just in the past year. But, I also watch as many races as I can. And when I watch these college meets, pro meets, or even World Record attempts, it's not uncommon to see a pacemaker. For a 1500, you'll see someone charged with taking them through 800 at a set time. In a marathon you sometimes have a rabbit leading them through 10 miles or so.

This past weekend in Chicago, there was a rabbit. One of the elite runners kept pushing the rabbit to go harder, and the rabbit obliged for a little bit. But eventually, even before mile 10, a group of elites left him behind. I read an interview with the always posi Abdi Abdirahman at Runners World this week where he mentioned that NYC in November will not have a rabbit. He said that was good. That it adds excitement to the race, I tend to agree.

Back to Philly. I kept going on my own, and I struggled towards the finish line. My last 5k was awful. Something I could have remedied by running a smarter pace at the beginning. I still set a PR by 1:55, but didn't reach my high end goal. Still, by setting that PR I found a sense of satisfaction in myself, and in doing it on my own.

It's difficult and a bit arrogant to say my satisfaction of doing that on my own is greater, or more deserved than that of someone who hit say 1:40 a minute and change ahead of me in a pace group. At the end of the day, that person ran a better race than me pace aided or not. They were quicker, and props to them. That said, to me, someone who has never been on a XC team, or training team (outside of the legendary The Kip Winger Running Team) running is an individual sport, and a test against what an individual can do.

I understand the limits of the human body. That there may be no reason to think an elite can run a 330 mile, and maybe a rabbit makes sense in a track meet for a mile to hit a certain goal. I don't think that sort of mindset should apply to the recreational runner.

Yes, it may be absurd for me to think a 1:25 half is possible given my training. But if I go into a race thinking the absolute best I can do for a half is 1:40, I've already capped my potential and lost half the battle. On the starting line, I just don't see a reason to have goals set in that way. It's cheesy, it's a hallmark card. But the sky is the damn limit. If I don't believe that through my training my body is capable of doing something greater than it's ever done before, that I can shatter even my own expectations, why am I on the starting line in the first place? And better yet what the hell have I been training for?